Argus Rangefinder

July 22, 2018  •  Leave a Comment

_MSP9722_MSP9722 Hey everyone !  A couple of weeks ago it was International Camera Day.  I was looking for a rangefinder type camera, preferably one from the 1960s.  So I put a request in my camera club's Facebook page, hoping one of the older members had one stuck in their closet that they hadn't used in a while and wanted to part with it.  I got one answer from one of the newer members saying he had picked some up in an estate sale but he didn't know anything about them. (He had two.)  So he said that he would bring them to me at the next club event.  When we had a scavenger hunt, he brought out a shoe box with a whole bunch of camera stuff old lenses, meters, and the two cameras.  I must be honest.  I had _MSP9723_MSP9723 never seen cameras like this before.  They were heavy,    square-ish, black, and had gears on the outside of them.  So I told him I would have to do some research on them.  He said, "Just take them and let me know what you find out."  He said he got them for $20.  So I started my research and found out that one of them was a 1942 Argus C3 Rangefinder, and it had a 50mm lens on it.  The other one was even older.  It was a 1939 Argus C2 rangefinder that had a 100mm lens on it.  They shot 35mm film and had the nickname the "Brick."  Now I have just got back into film and these were 35mm cameras.  Could I clean them up and they work?  I got online, found operation manuals, and learned all I could about them. These are some of the fun facts I found out.

-They were produced from 1938-1966 in Ann Arbor Michigan.

-They have interchangeable lenses (but they are a pain to change).

-They had three lenses:  a 35mm, 50mm, and 100mm that you could buy for the camera.

-They cost $35 originally, which is over $600 in today's money equivalent.

-They are made primarily of Bakelite Plastic and Metal Castings.

-They have two viewfinders:  one to focus with and one to compose your shot with.

-They have no metering system, so you use an external meter or use the Sunny 16 rule to set exposure.

_MSP9725_MSP9725

So I cleaned the best looking one out of the bunch, the 1942 model, and made sure everything worked by using a dummy roll of film that I have to practice loading and advancing the film and shooting the camera.  After I felt confident on the operation, I loaded it up with fresh film and took it into the back yard.  I did find it difficult to get it into focus.  The focusing viewfinder and the composure viewfinder are small.  And while rewinding the film after I was through, I only rewound 1/2 of the roll when I opened up the back (oops) and ruined half of the roll.  But I developed it anyway and got just a few in focus out of that half of a roll.  Hey, but it was a 76-year-old camera and it worked! 1942 Argus C3 Test Shot1942 Argus C3 Test Shot  Now, am I going to use the camera to take photos?  No, it will be a shelf decoration.  But I know it works and it was great fun finding out about it and its history.  Oh, by the way, I asked my photo buddy what he wanted for the cameras, and he said I could just keep them.  He only had 20 bucks in them.  Thanks, John!  So when you find an old camera that you want to put on your shelf for decoration, find out all you can about it.  It's great fun, and you'll enjoy your decoration even more, especially when someone asks about them.  Get out and shoot!

 


1961 Canon Canonet 19

July 14, 2018  •  1 Comment

Bell & Howell /CannonBell & Howell /CannonHere is the new addition to my film cameras . 1961 Canon Canonet 19. The Canon Canonet 19 is a sleek retro looking camera with great lines and a non-cluttered look.  It was the first of the Canon Canonet line of cameras.  The Canonet line ran from 1961 through the mid-'70s and was the first attempt at making cameras for the everyday man that wasn't a professional photographer.  Up until this camera, Canon was making Leica copies with minor variations.  Canon wasn't the strong brand that it is today.  A rangefinder type camera, Canon had only made one SLR to this point.  Rangefinders were still king.  This camera is a 35mm film camera with an auto function (shutter priority) and a light meter with no battery!  It has a 45mm f1.9 lens and a leaf shutter, which makes this a quiet camera to use.  This camera is great for street photography and everyday photography with a bright and large viewfinder as rangefinders do.  As you can see by the Bell & Howell/Canon logo, Canon partnered with Bell & Howell to make this camera.  Bell & Howell was a motion picture camera maker based in the United States.  But make no mistake, this is all a Canon product.  This camera can be shot in manual, although the meter doesn't work when in manual so you would either have to use the Sunny 16 rule or an external meter.  Here are some of the features. _MSP9739_MSP9739

-35mm film and can shoot to ASA 200 in auto.  In 1961 ASAs didn't go very high.  But with a lens with a f1.9 aperture, shooting in room light at 1/60 isn't a problem.  In manual you can shoot any ASA you want.

-Slenium Photocell wraps around the lens element so any filter that is placed on the camera the photocell see's through it so no compensation is needed.  Also no battery is needed.

-The camera in auto will not let the shutter work if the exposure isn't right.  You can push on the shutter button but nothing happens.  So in auto you can't shoot under or over exposed.

 

-The viewfinder, like most rangefinders, is bright and large.  Since you're not looking through the lens, frame lines are drawn to show what will be in the frame.  Also the aperture setting is at the bottom of the viewfinder to let you know what aperture you're at.

_MSP9738_MSP9738 - Self-timer.  This camera has a self-timer that is about 7 sec long.

-The film advance lever is located at the bottom of the camera giving the top of the camera clean lines.  It's in an odd place, and Canon moved it to the traditional top of the camera in later models.

This camera was touted as the poor man's Leica and sold off of the shelves.  You can still find these in yard sales for a great price, and they are great lightweight walk around cameras.  These are the cameras that gave Canon its popularity from the common man.  Still getting used to mine, but so far I love it.  Right now it's a 57-year-old camera that still takes great photos and looks great doing it.  Get out and shoot!


My Film Project

June 05, 2018  •  Leave a Comment

Old EyesOld Eyes I have started shooting film again. Why, you ask?  I began my photography obsession many years ago in the mid '70s, which is when I bought my first film SLR (Single Lens Reflex).  Of course, back then there was really no choice, just film.  So I shot like most teenagers do, taking pictures of friends, family, and events.  I always had my camera nearby.  I only knew enough about photography to get a good exposure, and that was about it.  As I grew older, joined the military, and got married, I started taking photos again and got a little more serious.  In the mid '80s I was shooting color slide film and developing it at home.  I did that for a while.  Later in the late '90s and early 2000s, I was shooting black-and-white film, developing and printing at home.  This was a big operation and labor intensive, especially when you make your one-and-only bathroom a darkroom.  When digital came out, I jumped on it full bore and set my trusty fully-manual SLR on the shelf, and that's where it has stayed for 15 years.  I had been shooting manual for so long I had to learn how to shoot aperture priority and shutter priority and all of the fancy stuff that cameras were doing.  It was like I was learning all over again how to shoot a camera.  I started with a point and shoot and worked my way to the biggest, baddest camera Nikon had to offer and all of the lenses to go with it.  I had to learn how to process my photographs in Lightroom and Photoshop.  Slowly, but surely, I started to go away from the big full frame cameras and started shooting mirrorless crop sensor cameras.  And I loved the way they felt in my hand, like 35mm SLRs did.  And I just love my mirrorless camera and lenses. IMG_1114IMG_1114

But something was missing.  I can't put my finger on it, but it was the sound that a mechanical camera makes.  The weight of the camera.  Rewinding the film.  The analog process I was missing.  I listened to a podcast called The Digital Story by Derrick Story, and he also has a blog The Analog Story.  I listened and started to get excited about film again.  I wanted to crank that crank and manually focus and turn dials that clicked.  I wanted to shoot film again.  I've heard that shooting film will make you a better digital photographer.  It will slow you down.  I don't want to go fully to film.  I will always be a digital photographer first, but I do want to shoot some film when the occasion suits.  How to go about it now in the digital age when film is kind of scarce?

First, I got my old trusty 35mm Pentax MX off of the shelf and cleaned it up well.  I had to replace the light seals that go around the door.  Those are the little felt or foam pieces that keep the light from ruining your film.  That was a chore.  It took me a couple of times before I got it right, but I did.  What about the light meter in the camera?  Was it any good?  The only way to find out was to get a roll of film, shoot it, and get it professionally developed.  I went to my local Walmart and guess what?  Film was on sale -- four rolls for five bucks!  So I bought 2 ,8 rolls of film.  I shot a roll of film in a couple of days and took it to Walgreens to get developed.  Well, things have changed in 15 years.  They have to send your film off, so it takes a week to get it back.  But not really because they don't give the negatives back.  You just get a CD with the scanned JPEGs on them.  All for 15 bucks!  I  was not a happy camper over the price.  But when I got my photos back, they were all correctly exposed!  So yay!  Light meter works and is accurate!  Now, I can't afford 15 bucks every time I shoot a roll of film, so I had to come up with a way that I could develop them myself.  I had never developed color negative film before, but I had done black and white and color slides.   I had all of the equipment.  I just had to get the chemicals and learn how.  So I did.  I developed my first roll of film, and it worked out great!  I had color negatives! 

                                                                                                   So now I have color negatives that I need to get scanned into my computer so _DSC0012-3_DSC0012-3 _DSC0012-Edit-2_DSC0012-Edit-2 I can get them into Lightroom and Photoshop and print.  But how?  I really don't have a scanner that can do a good job.  I don't want to spend any more than I have to.  So I decided to use my mirrorless camera to scan the negatives to get them into the computer.  I used my iPad with a white background to produce the light that shines through the negative.  I had an old film holder that I had from the black-and-white days to hold the film, and I used my Sony A6300 and an adapted Nikon 60mm macro lens that I have to focus manually.  I had the camera tethered to my laptop so I could look at the negative larger to make sure it was sharp.  And it worked!  I don't know If I'll keep using this system.  I would like something that autofocuses because my old eyes don't work like they used to.  But for now IMG_1118IMG_1118 this will do until I find a better way.

Now they're in the computer, but still a negative, so there was some processing that needed to be done.  The image needed to be inverted to make it a positive image. That could be done in Photoshop.  The colors also needed to be adjusted because negative film is made to be projected onto film paper, and the color cast are made for that.  The first couple of times I did all of this manually.  There are programs that will do this for you.  Of course they cost money, and I'm trying to do this on the cheap.  I did some research and found a free action that will color correct you photos in Photoshop.  It does a pretty good job, better that I was doing manually.  It's good enough now that I can live with it.  Later on I may want to upgrade to a software that does a better job.  So after I get everything into Lightroom, it's just like all my other photos.  I can go through my regular work flow and can publish to Flickr, Facebook, Instagram, or even print if I want.

It seems like a long process and it is.  But I really enjoy it.  Analog photography is like listening to LPs on a record player, maybe not as clear and it has pops and scratches.  But to me, that's what makes it great.  That's all for now.  Keep shooting!


'Podcasts' The Ones I Listen to

May 31, 2018  •  Leave a Comment

PodcastPodcast In my current "real job" I do about an hour or so commute every day to and from work.  To occupy my time, I have listened to the radio, audio books, iPod, and all sorts of things to keep my mind working on these two boring hours a day.  I'm kind of slow to learn new things, and I have only found out and started listening to podcasts for about a year now.  I only listen to photography-related podcasts, and I do have some favorites that I will share with you later.  Photography podcasts are a great way to learn new things, photography news, tips and techniques, and learn from more experienced seasoned photographers. So for these two hours a day, I'm doing photography.  Maybe not taking photographs, but getting inspired to take photos or about new gear or to try a new technique.  So here are my favorites. Itunes podcastItunes podcast

1. The Digital Story Photography Podcast.  This Podcast is currently my favorite and has over 600 episodes that last about 30 minutes each. Derrick Story, a California-based photographer/Author/workshop instructor, covers a variety of different topics related to photography.  He also runs The Nimble Photographer and The Analog Story blogs.  He is truly a great storyteller and a pleasure to listen to. He is into lightweight gear and shoots Micro 4/3's cameras.  He is the one that got me back into film photography again.

2. The Landscape Photography Podcast.  This podcast is about landscape photography and is hosted by Nick Page, a Washington State based photographer and a young photographer that has become pretty famous in a short time.  He also has a YouTube channel where he will take you with him on his trips around the west coast and abroad on workshops shooting landscapes.  His podcasts are very informative and funny at times.  He does interviews with famous landscape photographers.  His photo editing tips and tricks with luminosity masks have helped me a lot.

3. Tripod.  If you like Nick Page, you will like this older podcast.  This podcast was done by Nick before he got his own show, and it is much like the landscape photographer podcast.

4.  Recompose Photography Podcast.  This is hosted by Juan Pons and Andy Williams, two very seasoned and famous landscape and wildlife photographers.  Based out of the Northeastern US, they conduct workshops all over the world.  They formerly ran the Alpha Mirrorless Podcast for the TWIP (This Week in Photo) network, which is also a great podcast.  They go over tips and tricks and gear.  Super podcast.

5. Photo Taco Podcast.  Hosted by Jeff Harman, a California-based photographer/instructor, this podcast covers a variety of subjects from backing up your photos to astro photography. Very informative. This is a part of the Master Photography Team.

So these are my top five podcast shows, and here is a list of good shows that you may also like. logopodcastlogopodcast

1. Master Photography Podcast.  This podcast has different topics from travel photography, portraits, landscape, street photography, and the business side of photography.

2.  Photography Tips from the Top Floor.  This is a podcast that originates from Europe and is very good.  It almost made my top five.

3.  The Candid Frame.  This podcast centers around interviews with famous and up-and-coming photographers.  This podcast has been around for years and is very interesting.

4.  This Week In Photo  Another well-established podcast with over 500 episodes. 

5. Picture This! This is a podcast by Chelsea and Tony Northrup.  Both photographers and instructors and very big on YouTube.  They usually have a different perspective of topics and are very funny.

These are abut 10 podcasts to listen to.  There are a lot more, but these are my current favorites.  Podcasts are good to listen to while you're doing house work or yard work or even editing photos.  They are a good source of info and keep your head in the photography game.  So try them and keep on shooting!


RAW+JPEG! and why you should shoot this way

May 30, 2018  •  Leave a Comment

Elvis in WindowElvis in Window "I only shoot in RAW because only amateurs will shoot in JPEG."  Have you heard this or something simular to this?  I have and I probably have said it myself.  Don't get me wrong.  I still think shooting RAW is the best way to shoot.  But what's wrong with a JPEG?  That's what you see when you look at your photo on the LCD screen of your camera.  And I bet that's what you see 99% of the time on your computer and mobile device.  So why shouldn't we shoot in JPEG too?  How many times have you gotten home after a shoot and what you saw on the back of your camera is what you wanted in the first place and you had to spend time processing your RAW photo to get back to the JPEG rendering that was on the back of your camera?  I know I have.  We have very powerful cameras that we have paid a lot of money for.  The technology of these cameras is amazing!  We have WiFi and all of these modes that we can shoot in.  But if you're like me, you're shooting in RAW and spending time on the computer changing photos to get them to look like what's on the back of your camera or changing them to B/W.  Why don't we let the camera do this for us?  I listen to a lot of podcasts (a future blog), and I started hearing about shooting in RAW+JPEG.  And there are some really good reasons to do so.  This weekend I shot in RAW + JPEG for the first time, and I loved it!  Flag SailFlag Sail

Shooting in RAW+JPEG lets you use the power of your camera for processing your images.  First, you shoot in RAW because of all of the reasons that you've always heard about.  You can correct all of the mistakes better, you can change the white balance on the fly, you can do a lot of stuff with a RAW file that you just can't do with a JPEG.  But at the end of the day how many photographs do you really do all of this heavy lifting of the shadows and really working the photograph?  The answer for me is not much.  This weekend I went out with my photography club and I took 300 photographs.  Out of those 300, I really only had to work hard on one photograph to make it look the way I wanted.  And I had the RAW file to do that with. When you shoot RAW, what you download onto your computer isn't what you saw on the back of your camera.  So you spend time getting that RAW image to look like the JPEG that you saw.  Why not just use the JPEG if it looks the way you want it to out of camera?  Why spend the time making the RAW look like your JPEG?  Just use the JPEG.

_MSP9038_MSP9038 I love black and white photography.  When I shot film, that was what I shot most of the time.  Did you know you can set your camera up to shoot RAW + JPEG and then set your camera profile to shoot B/W.  You will now get the RAW file with all of the color and all of the info and a JPEG in B/W.  You will also see on the back of your camera the photo in B/W.  And I'm telling you the JPEG rendering is very good!  Your camera company has spent a lot of time and research money to make them look great!   The most work you'll have to do in post is crop.  Depending on your camera you may have many modes:  portrait, vivid, B/W, sepia, sunset, and many more to play with.  This will free up your creativity because you know you always have that RAW file in the background if you need it.

Using WiFi and posting to social media.  Posting to social media is what I do with most of my photographs.  Cameras have been out with WiFi for quite a while, but how many of us actually use them?  I must admit that I don't use it often.  But using the JPEG file makes it easier because there is less processing that needs to be done, and the file is smaller and easier to transfer via WiFi.  I did this this weekend (Memorial Day Weekend).  I went to my local Veterans Cemetery and took some shots of the tombstones with the flags.  I sent the JPEG to my phone using WiFi, sent it to "Snap Seed" to do a little crop, and then sent it to social media.  And it looked great!  I could have done this with my iPhone, but I wouldn't have gotten the shot I wanted.

Would I do this for all types of photography?  No, I wouldn't.  I wouldn't do this for portrait photography.  Landscape? Maybe. Sports, no.  I would shoot JPEG.  But photography like travel, urban, street, and almost anything else I would.  And I will.  So the next photo walk you do, try RAW+JPEG and see what you get.  You'll be surprised.  Have fun and keep shooting!

Subscribe
RSS
Archive
January February March April May June July August (4) September (4) October (5) November (4) December (3)
January (5) February (4) March April (2) May (1) June July August September October November (3) December (2)
January February March April May June July August (1) September (1) October (1) November (1) December (1)
January (1) February March April May June July August September October (3) November (2) December