My Favorite Camera #361

June 20, 2025  •  Leave a Comment

Hey Ya'll, How's your week going? Me? Pretty good. Today I want to talk about what my favorite camera is to shoot with. Now I am very lucky I have many cameras accumulated during my years of photography from film to digital and out of all of the camera's I have I have a couple that I would call my favorite. They are not necessarily my best camera's or my newest. They are not even the ones that I would take on a big trip. But they are fun to shoot. And that's the most important thing I think is that they are fun to shoot. That's why we do photography because it's fun and a great way to experience life. First we'll talk about film camera's because film and digital are different animals.

Film Camera's. I have been shooting my own film camera's from the mid 1970's and have had and accumulated quite a few camera's. My first camera in film was the Pentax K1000. This is the camera that I learned basic photography on. Nice and simple the only thing that wasn't mechanical was the meter in it that was powered by batteries. I have shot 110 camera's for family stuff but to tell you the truth the ones I used were like toys and didn't take very good photo's. 35mm has been my standard for years and I have just got into 120 medium format film. My favorite film camera is a 35mm and cost me just 120 dollars. It's the Canon Canonet QL17 GIII. It came out in the 1972 and is a range finder camera. It is known as the poor man's Leica.  It focus is quick and precise. The QL in the name stands for quick loading which it is and easy to load. It can shoot in Shutter priority and will not shoot if you are way out of whack with your settings. It will shoot in manual. And it is a very handsome camera. I have got nothing but great photo's out of it. It has a 40mm fixed lens with a maximum aperture of f1/1.7. My runner up is a Canon Demi EE17 which is a 1966 camera that shoots half frame 35mm. It is a sexy camera and the only thing that kept it my top spot is that it uses zone focusing so sometimes you get out of focus shots. If it had the same focusing as the Canonet it would be #1. But the Canonet Ql17 GIII is my favorite film camera to shoot.

Digital Camera's. From my first digital camera a Kodak point and shoot I have gone through many camera's. From High end professional models to consumer camera's. Some were more fun to shoot than others. I have shot Simi professional with high end cameras and as an amateur like I am now with consumer and of course I use my phone like everyone else. Let me start out by saying that my phone isn't my favorite digital camera although it does get great photo's when needed. I have shot all different sensor sizes and have enjoyed all of them. Most of my photo's in my website are shot in crop sensor (APSC) sized. I am shooting full frame sensor Sony's now as my main camera's and love the results I get from them and they go with me when I travel for photography trips. With all of the lenses that come with them. My favorite camera to shoot and the one that I use the most isn't a full frame or a crop sensor camera. Its smaller. Now I have camera that will shoot under water and if you count GoPros ones that will clip onto things for unique shots and even shoot video's. But it's not those camera's also. The thing that makes it the most favorite for meIs the mobility of this little camera. It can fit in my pocket or around my neck and hardly is noticed. I purchased this little camera to go to Washington DC with my wife. I wanted a camera that I wouldn't be consumed by while with her. So she wouldn't have to wait on me fumbling with lenses or settings. It's a perfect travel companion and goes with me on almost every trip. It's so versatile that I use it as a backup to my bigger Sony's when I travel. It's the Canon Powershot G7XII which came out in 2016. It has a 24-100mm full frame equivalent lens at f1.8-2.8. It has a 1" sensor at 20megapixels. Its articulating screen is also a touch screen and can easily move focus with a touch of the finger. I have it set up so it will accept 52mm filters like a polarizer and ND filter. It also has an electronic ND filter that you can use. It shoots in Manual and all of the other modes that my larger cameras do. Is it perfect? No but it is my favorite. It goes with me almost anywhere for the just in case photo's. Are other camera's better ? You bet but this one is fun. When I take my big trips this year it will be right beside me. When I went to South Dakota it was there for shots in the car and in towns. I didn't carry my big camera for town walks just this little point and shoot.

How funny is it that even though I am a devoted Sony shooter my favorite camera's to shoot are both Canon. Digital and Film. LOL Both of these cameras are point and shoot camera's and I don't have to mess with bringing extra lenses and gear when I'm out and about with these cameras. What are your favorite camera's to shoot? Camera's are very personal things and I suspect there will be all sorts of answers to that question. Well that's it for me this week until next, Get out and Shoot. With your favorite.

Hey if you want to check out my photography go to my instagram account Max Stansell Photography there are over 2000 posts there. Here is the link

 Max Stansell Photography Instagram Link

 


The Mechanics of OFF Camera Flash #360

June 13, 2025  •  1 Comment

Hey Everyone! Hope you've had a super week! This week I want to talk about something I don't think I've talked about much. Off camera flash and the mechanics on how to hook up your camera to shoot off camera. I was recently on a workshop that my club had on Portrait Photography and using off camera strobes. You may not know but I used to do a lot of portrait work and shot weddings and the such. But as I've got older I haven't done as much. You can use off camera flash to do all sorts of photography from table top , macro, real-estate and yes portraits. Attending this workshop got me thinking about the past and the tools and the mechanics on how to set up off
camera flash even if you shoot film instead of digital. Honestly I haven't shot much off camera flash with film but have recently and it works pretty well you just have to figure out how to get the flash to sync with your camera when you push the shutter button. Now most camera's have a hot shoe on top of your camera that you can put a flash and through the connection when you push the shutter your flash goes off. This is a very flat and not flattering light and to improve it you must get the flash off of the camera and to the side somehow. Thats what this blog is about the mechanics of OFF Camera Flash. 

Sync Cord: The easiest way is with a sync cord. This cord goes from a port on your camera (usually covered by a little plastic cover) to a port on the flash or strobes that you have. This is how it was done in the old days and cords and cables were strewn all over the place. This is a cheap way to do it and it works. The drawback is the cord you can only go as far away from your flash with the length of your cord.


Infra Red triggers: Infra Red triggers are built into some camera's. They allow you to trigger the flash through an infra red signal that comes from your camera to the flash. The trick is that it is proprietary. You must use your camera's brands flash. With Nikon you must use Nikon flash , Canon you must use Cannon flash. Which makes this a very expensive endeavor as brand name flashes are very expensive. Also you must have line of site with these triggers . Much like the remote control of your TV you can't have anything get in-between the camera and flash or it doesn't work.


Radio Triggers: These triggers use radio waves to transmit a signal from your camera to the flash or strobe. You hook a transmitter to your camera's hot shoe and receiver to your flash or strobe light. Then through radio waves you can trigger the flash to fire when you press the shutter button. These are very popular and come in many price ranges from 40 dollars to hundreds of dollars. Pocket wizards were the industry standard many years ago but you can have all sorts that work great. The biggest thing with these is to make sure that you are not on the same frequency as another nearby photographer or your flashes will work off of his press of the shutter too. These triggers do not need line of site and can be placed almost anywhere and the radio waves will reach them witch is great for back lighting where the light is placed behind the subject. These types of triggers only trigger the flash they do not work with TTL of your camera they are used on manual flashes and strobes.

TTL Radio Trigger/Controllers: Then there is the Controller trigger. It takes all the info from your camera and transfers it to the strobe and makes the proper power flash off of these calculations. It can shoot TTL and High Speed Sync. It can control from your camera many flashes at one time and have them flash at different powers to each flash. These triggers are proprietary to the brand of camera you have. So if you have a Nikon you have to get a controller that fits a Nikon. The controller mounts to the hot shoe and you can dial in what you want and what channel each flash is on. You can have external receivers or they are built into the flashes themselves. The flashes/strobes have to be compatible with the controller used. Godox brand is the most popular but there are others also. The controllers cost about 70 bucks but you must also purchase the flashes and or strobes .

Slaves for Multiple flashes: If you have more than one flash that you want to trigger but only have one trigger and one receiver or only have a sync cord going to one flash you can use optical flash slaves that hook to the second flash or strobe. When it sees a flash from the first flash that is synced it goes off instantaneously . You must manually adjust these flashes but the system works well and I used it for years before I got newer trigers for my flashes. 

Being able to control the light really makes you a great photographer and shooting off camera flash and strobes is the first step in really being able to CONTROL the light. Not just react to it. Hope this was helpful until next week Get out and Shoot!

 

Hey if you want to check out my photography go to my instagram account Max Stansell Photography there are over 2000 posts there. Here is the link

 Max Stansell Photography Instagram Link

 


Packing for a Street Photography Trip #359

June 06, 2025  •  2 Comments

Hello Everyone! Hope you're having a great week. Me? Pretty well. Hey I was thinking about what I would take on a Street photography trip let's say to New Your City. The Big Apple! I have never been but am looking to go soon so what would I take on let's say a long extended weekend trip. What camera gear or my computing needs for that matter. I know I want to be quick and nimble while in route so just a carry on bag if flying or taking the train. So I would want all of my gear and clothing to fit in the carry on which would be some sort of backpack. Light on gear and clothes. So let's get started with the easy stuff clothes.

If I was going on a 4 day trip to include travel days on each end. I would probably take two pairs of pants the ones I was wearing and one other. And a couple of shirts. These clothes would have to be very packable not jeans or clothes like that. I like to travel with convertible pants that can become shorts at a moments notice and shirts that are super light weight. Just to make things easier well say that this trip is in the spring so cool in the mornings and warm during the day. So I would want some sort of jacket that would compact down to a small size when it warmed up. Just a few personal toiletries to get by with. A comfortable pair of shoes because I'll be doing some walking. I would put all of this in some sort of packing cube that would fit in my backpack.

Now let's talk about camera gear and computing. I'll start with computing because I would keep it simple some sort of iPad maybe my iPad mini. It's small and compact and I'll be able to back up my photo's from each day and even edit some if I need to. Now to camera gear. I have lots of good choices to choose from. If I wanted to keep it super small I could use my point and shoot Canon G7XII . Its small compact, 20mp type 1 sensor and has a 24-100 equivalent lens with maximum aperture of f/1.8-2.8. It's very discrete and small and would go almost unnoticed . But never have been to New York before I would want something a little more punch. I would probably bring my A7C with a 50mm and a 16-35mm lens. Both are small-ish but would definitely be noticed more than the point and shoot. And of course I would have to carry some sort of bag to hold the extra lens and batteries. Or I could carry a 20-70 f4 lens I have and the Sony and just do one lens. It would be a bigger set up but it would have a better camera set up with just one lens. Now if I was really brave I could go with a film camera and shoot film the whole time there. If I were I would bring my Canon Cannonet GIII QL17. This is known as the poor mans Leica with a 40mm f/1.7 lens. It would definitely tic all of the boxes but then its film and won't be as flexible as digital. So what to do? On a special trip like this I could go without a camera and plan a trip to B&H Photo Video and buy a camera for street there. It would almost be worth it maybe something like a Fuji X100 a built to be a street camera. There are so many ways to go. What would you do?

Well since this is all hypothetical I would probably go to B&H and buy a new camera just to say that I had done it. But in reality it would probably be the Sony A7C although I think the smart choice would be the Point and shoot.  Well that's just me dreaming. What would you do? Let me know. Until next week Get out and Shoot!

Hey if you want to check out my photography go to my instagram account Max Stansell Photography there are over 2000 posts there. Here is the link

 Max Stansell Photography Instagram Link

 


What all cameras have in common! #358

May 30, 2025  •  Leave a Comment

Hey Y'all ! Hope you're having a great day! We as camera buffs are always looking at the latest and greatest in cameras and camera related gadgets. We as consumers try to dissect what is different or what is newer on each of our cameras and new ones that come out each year. And to admit there is a lot that is different between camera brands and models but there are some things that are the same of all cameras. Even ones from decades long ago and we forget that these little machines still have  the same goal to capture a moment in time , an image. Remembering what is the same makes the photography much more simple. I think that cameras are getting more and more complicated when they should be staying simple. I shoot with all kinds of cameras from older film cameras to newer mirrorless cameras. Sometimes I think that the newer ones can be more complicated than the early film were. Why do you think that is. I certainly don't know. Maybe the newer generations didn't know how simple it was in the past to take a photo. But people that were raised holding a computer in their hand that was advanced than the computer that sent men to the moon seem to think that things need to be more complicated. Now I'm not generation bashing I just want to explain what is the same in photography. Lets start.

The medium used to capture the image. Although it has changed from film to digital sensors a lot of the same principals still apply. In the film days you could choose your film based on either black and white or color and you could choose the sensitivity of the film by the ASA (American Standards Association ) now known as ISO (international Standards Organization ) . Modern Digital you can dial in your ISO and you can change the look of the image from color to black and white. Just the same as film. Are the newer Digital sensors more flexible than the roll of film? Well of course they are but doesn't that make it more complicated . With more choices comes paralysis by analysis . Not being able to make a decision quickly. Like buying glasses at the eye doctor. There are a wall of choices hundreds of choices  and to you they all look alike. Hard to make a choice. But besides that they are really the same.

Lenses used in film and digital are basically the same. Although more modern the newer lenses are basically the same with aperture blades that can open and close to make the hole bigger or smaller. There are focusing rings that you can manually focus with. Many older lenses are manual focusing while newer ones are auto focusing using little motors and gears inside of the lenses to do the work that your hand and eye did. Now does the newer lenses focus quicker and maybe even more sharper focus? Well of course they do. But they are very similar except most modern lenses are much larger to house the newer components. 

Shutters are the same. Shutters with the ability to change shutter speeds. Either Focal plane shutters or leaf shutters in the film era worked very much the same as the modern shutters . Now shutter speeds go up to 1/8000 of a second where 1/1000 was the norm for many years in the film era and consumer cameras were at 1/500. Now we have mechanical and electronic shutters and I'm sure in the future mechanical will be a thing of the past but they do the same thing. They let light in for a certain amount of time so they do the same thing.

View finders are kind of the same. Optical view finders showed you what was going to be in your photo. Modern view finders do that and a whole lot more. It can be like flying a jet with heads up display with all of the gismos in the frame when you are viewing your subject. Stuff like the meter, battery life, camera settings like shutter speed, ISO and aperture . All which is very nice but can become kind of cluttered. Of course you can pick and choose what you want to see in your view finder.

Meter to measure light. Just about all cameras from the 1960's and on had some sort of meter in them to measure the light. Film camera's used center weighted metering where modern cameras can use an array of different metering modes to include center weighted. Matrix or Averaging metering mode takes in the whole scene and averages out meter reading. Most photographers use this type of metering 100% of the time. Why so many choices? Just to confuse you LOL! I think that modern metering is better than old but I didn't have a problem with the old ones either  and still use them in my film cameras.

Things like shutter buttons, self timers, and the such are all still there. So what I'm trying to get at is yes they have changed but the principals like the Exposure Triangle are still the same. Basically you have a box that captures light and puts the image onto some sort of medium. So when you look at that new camera that has all of the gismos on it before you spend your hard earned money make sure you need the gismos that it is offering. Many times the answer is no you have all that you need in the camera you have that will still take great photo's.

Until next week , Get out and Shoot!

Hey if you want to check out my photography go to my instagram account Max Stansell Photography there are over 2000 posts there. Here is the link

 Max Stansell Photography Instagram Link

 

 


As an Amateur Photographer do you need a website? #357

May 23, 2025  •  Leave a Comment

Hey What's Up? How is everyone doing this week? Me? Pretty well, thanks for asking. This week I want to talk about something I don't think I have discussed before, websites. If you're reading this you know I have a website . It's what all of these blogs are attached to. I have some of my best photo's in galleries that you can see. I really don't try to sell photos but will if someone wants one. But the question is do you need a website if you are just an amateur photographer? I really don't think so .  Now don't get me wrong this blog isn't against websites just that I don't think that you need one but let's do some pro's and con's on websites.

Pro's: Websites are easy to put together and create. There are all kinds of companies with templates that let you build and personalize your very own website. If you want to sell some of your images these websites make it easy to do so. They may even take care of all of the work and just send you your cut of the money made from selling images. You can have a blog if you like to write like I do. I've never been much of a writer growing up but after I got a website and gave it a go I found that I liked doing it. They like anything else can be inexpensive. I think I started mine for 5 bucks a month for the basic service but I think the price has risen over the years but it's still less than 10 dollars per month. But like anything else the more you want to do with it the more it will cost. You can have world wide coverage of your photo's and presented the way you want them to be seen. If you use any social media type service they will compress and alter your photo's a little. And of course it's kind of neat to say " just check out my website" when you're taking to someone new.

Con's: It takes effort to keep up a website. You have to update the site with new images and blogs to keep it current . You don't have a staff to take care of this you are a staff of one. Subscriptions can be a pain. How many do you have from Adobe, Netflix, Hulu, ... This is just one more.  So there is the website and then there is the domain name mine is MaxStansellPhotography.com but that doesn't come free you have to purchase and make sure it's not already out there. You will probably have a email attached to the domain name so there is the upkeep of that also.

So there are some pro's and con's It looks like the pro's have over taken the con's but the con's are strong arguments. To tell you the truth If I had to do it all over again I don't know if I would get a full fledged photography website. Most if not all my activity on this site is this blog. I keep it pretty active as I post once a week. I think that the only reason that I keep this website open is because of the blog. I have over 350 of them and I don't want all of that work to disappear .  I have the basic subscription so it's fairly cheap to keep. I don't update the photo's as much as I should but I do like saying "Check out my blog" or "Check out my Website" Its something I have built. But if you just want to share photo's there are sites like Flickr, 500PX, Instagram or even on Facebook. Most of these sites aren't really secure so when your photo is out on the web it's out there for anyone to grab. With a website Its a little more secure but still there are ways folks can get your photographs. Me I really don't care that much if someone uses my photo's if they aren't making a profit from it. I would prefer they ask but I have found my photo's in Text books and web articles and I'm not too bothered with it. I don't do photography to make money it's for fun. But Monday Quarterbacking I would get a website but one for just the blog and maybe not to showcase photography. But that's just me. It doesn't cost much to do a website and I do enjoy playing with it.

Well that's my thoughts . Until next week Get out and Shoot!

Hey if you want to check out my photography go to my instagram account Max Stansell Photography there are over 2000 posts there. Here is the link

 Max Stansell Photography Instagram Link

 

Subscribe
RSS
Archive
January February March April May June July August (4) September (4) October (5) November (4) December (3)
January (5) February (4) March April (2) May (1) June July August September October November (3) December (2)
January February March April May June July August (1) September (1) October (1) November (1) December (1)
January (1) February March April May June July August September October (3) November (2) December