Does Gear Really Make the Photo II, Post trip conclusions

October 28, 2017  •  7 Comments

22814418_10210727646164222_1824769434837060805_n22814418_10210727646164222_1824769434837060805_n Hey everyone!  I hope you've had a good couple of weeks. Well, this is a Part II to the "Does Gear Really Make the Photo?" blog.  My camera club went on our annual trip to the mountains for a week of fun photography.  We shot wildlife, waterfalls, cityscapes, landscapes, and macros.  We shot it all and had a great time.  As I stated in my last blog, my experiment for this trip was to use my crop sensor mirrorless Sony A6300 for my main camera for the whole trip.  We went to some of the same places that we went to in 2015, so I will show you similar shots that I took two years ago and this year and see if you can tell the difference from a 36 megapixel full frame camera compared to my 24 megapixel crop sensor mirrorless camera that I used on this trip.  But first, let me tell you about the experience I had with my little camera on this trip.

22687733_10210704932316390_5072236385493429418_n22687733_10210704932316390_5072236385493429418_n Using this camera on this trip was fantastic and I think made my photography better because I could carry so much with me without being weighed down like a pack mule.  I used a little side bag that I called my purse that held my camera, three lenses, batteries, SD cards, GoPro, filters, sunglasses, and phone.  And I had room for a sandwich also if I wanted one. LOL! The weight of this bag wasn't any more that that of a full frame camera and a good 24-70 f2.8 lens.  I loved having this bag with me.  I could change lenses on the fly, and it was better than a backpack because I didn't have to take it off to access it.  The three main lenses I carried were a Sony 10-18 f4, a Sony 18-105 f4, and a Sony 55-210mm f4.5-6.3.  The last lens was the weakest in the set and at a range that I don't use often, but I did get a few good ones out of it.  This lens I will replace with a better quality one.  While on the trip, I used a Canon 70-200 f4 L non IS lens with an adapter that makes it autofocus with my Sony.  It 22730511_10210704932196387_7018311079726609722_n22730511_10210704932196387_7018311079726609722_n worked great and quality was fantastic.  I will be purchasing this lens soon.  My main lens was the 18-105mm and was a great walk-around lens.  Worked well on the long exposures also.  The 10-18 was a fantastic performer when I used it mostly for long exposures.  I had circular polarizers that I used often and a Lee filter kit that I used for waterfalls (long exposures) and sunrises and sunset. And all of this fit into my little purse quite well.  I had the flexibility to add and remove things as I needed them all while being lightweight.  As I get older and less agile, the weight and size of my gear makes a difference in my stamina, and that will affect my photography.

The quality of my little mirrorless camera didn't surprise me.  It is a fantastic camera with a great sensor.  As you probably know, I have been using a Sony crop sensor mirrorless for the last couple of years.  I first bought one to use hiking and slowly fell in love with it.  I upgraded from a Sony A6000 to a A6300 this year, and it is a great camera.  A mirrorless crop sensor has been my main camera for a couple of years now, and I think I'm going to take the plunge and get rid of all of my Big Boy camera and lenses and go to a mirrorless crop sensor from now on.  I have already sold a couple of lenses and plan to sell my full frame bodies and other lenses and flashes that I have.  I'm going to gear down instead of gearing up like I usually do.  The quality of my photos was the same or even better in my opinion.  Below are some photos that I have taken from two years ago and from this trip.  I put them side by side so you could see if there was a big difference in quality of the photos.  Take time to look at them and see if you can tell which one was a full frame camera with F2.8 glass and which one was my little mirrorless Sony with F4 glass.

The photos on the left side column were taken with a full frame Nikon D800 with F2.8 lenses.  The photos on the right were taken with a mirrorless crop sensor Sony A6300 with F4 lenses.  To me it is hard to tell the difference, especially if they are going to be used on the internet or to make prints or canvases that I would print.  Are the full frame cameras great?  You bet they are they are fantastic!  The professional 2.8 glass is awesome!  But do I really need it for the type of photography that I'm going to do?  I don't think so. The mere size and weight of theses cameras are what is really turning me, and the quality of the shots that I'm getting with this small camera is some of the best I've shot.  If I were doing a lot of portraiture or weddings, the larger camera would be an asset.  But for what I do, it is not.  So now I am taking inventory and getting rid of all of my larger gear.  Will I ever buy a full frame camera again?  Probably, but it will be of the mirrorless cameras that are full frame which makes them smaller.  But for now I'm going to stick with the camera that I used this year.  Any thoughts?  Let me know and keep shooting!


2015-10-25-MSP-333Photo 1 D800 70-200 2.8Max Stansell Photography 20171022_GAPC FC Day 8_011320171022_GAPC FC Day 8_0113Sony A6300 70-200 f4

2015-10-24-MSP-0222015-10-24-MSP-022Max Stansell Photography 20171018_GAPC Fall Colors 2017_001620171018_GAPC Fall Colors 2017_0016 20171018_GAPC Fall Colors 2017_001820171018_GAPC Fall Colors 2017_0018 Looking Glass Falls NCLooking Glass Falls NCMax Stansell Photography 2015-10-24-MSP-0732015-10-24-MSP-073Max Stansell Photography 20171022_GAPC FC Day 8_009020171022_GAPC FC Day 8_0090


Product Review Neewer N40S

September 19, 2017  •  69 Comments

20170826_untitled shoot_000220170826_untitled shoot_0002  Hey, Everyone !  I've got a new product review that I want to share with you.  As you may know, I have fallen in love with the Sony Alfa series of cameras for doing the majority of my personal photography.  Most of this stuff is outdoors, but I wanted a flash that would do TTL.  I am a big believer in the Yongnuo brand of inexpensive flashes for my Nikon camera and have several that I can use in manual mode with my Sony A6300 which is fine, but I wanted at least one flash that I could use TTL with and hopefully one that would easily travel.  So I started my search for a small flash that could do TTL. 

20170826_untitled shoot_000120170826_untitled shoot_0001 I stared with Google and of course my beloved YouTube.  The flash that kept coming up was the Nissin i40 made in Japan.  It does TTL and high-speed sync with a guide number of 40.  So I looked it up on Amazon and it was $260, which was out of my price range. Then I saw the Neewer N40S made in China.  It's pretty much a copy of the Nissin i40 and the price is right at 75 bucks, so I had to try it.

My first impression of it when I got it was that it was small.  It feels well built and comes with a case that is well built. The guide number is 40, and the guide number of my Yongnuos are 58.  So they are not quite as strong as the Yongnuos are.  But thats okay.  I'm not looking to do a lot of flash photography with my Sony.  Very easy to operate with dial and not a digital display with complicated menus.  The unit can be run in manual, automatic , TTL, and high-speed sync, and it has a video light built in.  Now, the video light is not its strongest feature, but it's kind of cool that it has one.

20170826_untitled shoot_002120170826_untitled shoot_0021 20170826_untitled shoot_002320170826_untitled shoot_0023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here are two photos that were both taken at 1/2000 sec @ f4.0, the one on the left without flash and one on the right with flash. High speed sync check!  This little flash has ticked all the boxes on my checklist.  I think for the money and what I'm going to use it for, it's the right one for me.

Keep shooting!


Does Gear Really Make the Photo?

August 14, 2017  •  2 Comments

They say that admitting to a problem is the first step in solving a problem, so here goes.  I have been a gear hound for a long time.  I have GAS (Gear Acquisition Syndrome).   For some time now I have been under the impression that gear makes the photo, and I'm not alone.  There are lots of you just like me.  I have accumulated some of the finest gear that money can buy, and my photos have improved.  But was it because of my gear or the know how that I have acquired learning how to use this gear? My Camera'sMy Camera's  To be honest, I think it is a little of both.  Good gear does matter to a point for sharpness, depth of field, and dynamic range.  But composure, making long exposures, and composition are all things that the camera does not control, we do.  Do we really need the top of the line gear if this is just our hobby and most of what we use our images for is for putting on some website?  Do I need 36 megapixels?  Do I need 42 megapixels?  I say no unless your printing for billboards!  So what do you need for good photos?  My answer is simple.  The best camera you can afford.  Most of all the new cameras that are coming out now will do the job.  So don't max out your credit cards buying the most expensive thing out there just because some article says to do so.  So what is my criteria for a good camera?  One, that you can put it in full manual mode, that you can shoot in RAW, and that you can change lenses (some of the built-in zooms work fine too).  I don't think megapixels make a difference in today's cameras.  All of them have plenty. DSCF0513DSCF0513

My camera club goes to the mountains once a year and spends a week with the fall colors,  waterfalls, and wildlife.  This week is the most photo active time of the year for me as I am not a professional full-time photographer.  Some of my best photos of the year come from this trip.  I usually carry my big camera and all of my expensive lenses with me and really get good results.  A couple of years or so ago I purchased a Sony mirrorless camera that has become my go-to camera.  It's small and compact compared to my big Nikon rig that I have.  I bought it for backpacking because of its size and weight, but I have come to love it.  So this year when my camera club goes to the mountains, the Sony mirrorless camera will be my main camera for the trip.  I will use it for the waterfalls, wildlife, all the fall colors, and everything else.  I will take my Nikon and one lens as a backup.  The Sony kit will contain the following items:

  1. Sony A6300 body
  2. 2 kit lens 16-50 mm and 55-210 lens
  3. 18-105mm F4 lens and 10-18mm F4 lens
  4. Pentax 28mm  f2.8 manual focus lens W/Sony adapter
  5. Nikon 60mm f2.8 macro manual focus lens W/Sony adapter

My Nikon will be the D800 with 24-70mm 2.8 lens.

10404408_10203141767201989_3296463740236017661_n10404408_10203141767201989_3296463740236017661_n We will be visiting some of the same waterfalls that we have visited in the past that I used my Nikon on, and I want to see what the difference is with my Sony mirrorless and my full frame Nikon.  Will my photos be better, worse, or the same?  I believe they will be the same, but only time will tell.  If they do turn out the same or even better, what does that mean?  Will I get rid of my expensive equipment?  Will I sell?  I don't know.  I still like my big camera and lenses for portraits, especially when using studio lights or flashes.  But I could use my mirrorless to do the same.  All that is still up in the air.  But for the foreseeable future I will be using my Sony for everything except portraits.

How many times have you been looking at Facebook or some other social media outlet and saw a fantastic photograph, only to be dismayed when you found out it was taken with an iPhone?  Remember, photography is supposed to be fun and not a contest to see who has the most or the biggest gear.  Enjoy your photography, and save your money so you can go to more places to use your photography.  Remember, it's not the camera.  It's the photographer that takes great photos.  I plan on gearing down and making things more simple, not more complicated. Get out and shoot! 

 


William B. Umstead State Park Hike

December 13, 2016  •  Leave a Comment

Umstead 2Umstead 2 Located in Raleigh, North Carolina, the William B. Umstead State Park is a great park with 22 miles of hiking trails that are well used.  The park is situated in Raleigh and the townsfolk use it a lot for hiking, trail running, biking ...   Umstead 3Umstead 3 The 22 miles of trails give you access to most of the park and vary in lengths from short to long trails.  A couple of my photography friends and I went up there to do some hiking and get some exercise.  Of course, being photographers, we had to document the event.   GOPR2757GOPR2757DCIM\101GOPRO We had a great time of fellowship and also had a little foot problems by one of the guys that I'm sure will be corrected by our next hike.  Please enjoy the video from the link below!

 

Umstead State Park Hike Video


Hiking Gear

December 09, 2016  •  Leave a Comment

 

As a landscape and nature photographer, hiking is kind of second nature.  You have to get to great locations to get great shots that everyone else does not have.  The longer your hike is, the more important it is to pack light.  Weight matters!  My everyday/hiking kit I try to keep as light as possible.  The kit I'm going to show you is right at 7 lbs.  My big professional Nikon D800 camera and one lens weigh in at 5 lbs. That's only one lens, no tripod filters or anything else, just camera.  My hiking kit consists of four lenses (I have other ones in the wings to switch out if I need to), a tripod, filters, and lots of other goodies.  Here is a photo of my stuff and an itemized list.

_MSP4337-Edit_MSP4337-Edit

1. Camera Sony A6000 (crop sensor) with Pentax 28mm f2.8 vintage lens which I used on a film camera about 30ish years ago. With the crop sensor, the lens is at a focal length of about 42mm, good for close photographs like a walk in the woods.

2.Wide angle lens Sony 10-18mm f4.  Gives me a focal length of 15-25mm with the crop sensor.  Super sharp lens for big landscapes like the mountains.

3. Mid Range Telephoto- 18-105mm.  This one gives me a focal range of 25-150mm.  This is the lens that gets swapped out a lot with other lenses.  This is a great all-in-one lens and has given me some great photos.  Depending on where I'm hiking, this may or may not be in the bag as it is sometimes swapped out for a vintage 35-70mm f2.8 lens.

4. Telephoto Pentax 80-200 mm f4.6.  Gives me a focal range of 120-300mm.  This is a cheap plastic lens that I got 30 years ago, but it's lightweight and pretty sharp.  This is the range that I use the least.

5. Peak Design clip.  This allows me to put my camera right on my backpack strap to keep my hands free but gives me quick access to my camera.

6. GoPro Session 4 on a hat clip.  The GoPro is the newest addition to my camera kit.  I used to use my phone for everything video-wise, but this is a great piece of kit!  I can use it for biking also and it's waterproof.

7. Peak Design Leash.  Love this for this small camera.  It gives me a sense of security when it's strapped to my wrist!

8. Batteries and Charger.  Mirrorless cameras can eat up batteries, so I carry two extras and odds and ends in this case.

9. Polarizer Case.  I carry circular polarizers for most of my lenses.

10. ND Filters.  I carry a variable circular natural density filter and step-down rings to fit most of my lenses.

11. Anker 10500 mAh.  I use this to charge GoPro, camera batteries, and iPhone.

12. Bag for GoPro and cleaning clothes for lenses.

13. Joby Gorilla Pod for GoPro.

14. Stick Pick Mount. Allows me to put GoPro on my hiking stick like a selfie stick.

15. Trail Pix Ultra light Tripod.  I'm able to use this with my hiking sticks with one from a buddy and create a tripod that will handle up to 7 lbs.

16. Altoids, Advil, Tums, moist lens clothes for my glasses and or lenses.

17. Outdoor Products Hydration Pack.  I got this from Walmart for 40 bucks, and it works great for this small load.

18. Fleece skull cap, neck warmer, waterproof gloves, and bandana for keeping warm and such.

19. Kelty Trekking Poles.  This is probably one of the best kept secrets in hiking.  Trekking poles will save your knees and save your butt from falls.  They are great long trips.

20. Emergency poncho, wet wipes.  Poncho is for rain showers.  I got caught in the rain once on a hike and just got drenched, and since then I always carry an emergency poncho.  And for those emergency bathroom breaks without a bathroom, the wet wipes or toilet paper is a must.

21. Finn the Explorer, sunglass case, lens brush.  Finn the Explorer is new, and he travels with me.  I try to take a photo of him when we go to a new place.  Sunglass case and lens brush are self explanatory.

Subscribe
RSS
Archive
January February March April May June July August (4) September (4) October (5) November (4) December (3)
January (5) February (4) March April (2) May (1) June July August September October November (3) December (2)
January February March April May June July August (1) September (1) October (1) November (1) December (1)
January (1) February March April May June July August September October (3) November (2) December